Okay, I've spent most of my Saturday morning watching the Rihanna video, and I've decided I have more to say.
Here's the video if you haven't seen it.
It seems that most people don't like it because it's 'too racy' and 'too close to pornography'.
Rihanna has said about the video: “S&M is not about sex, well it’s about metaphorical sex". This sort of annoys me. I think it's a huge misconception that people have about BDSM in general - that it's about sex. For those of you who don't know, BDSM is a shorthand representation for bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, sadism and masochism. BDSM doesn't have to be about sex - sometimes it is, but sometimes it isn't.
For example, for me, sometimes spanking is sexual, and sometimes it's just a great bonding experience or stress relief. The same goes for submission - sometimes it's about the power dynamic in a sexual relationship, but often times it's about putting the person I am submitting to first - thinking of him or her needs before my own. The same goes for masochism (pleasure from receiving pain). It doesn't have to necessarily be sexual pleasure, although often, it is. A lot of people in BDSM scenes engage in power play/bondage/discipline without any sexual contact.
Besides, even if the video is about sex, what's the big deal? Sex is natural, and just because BDSM is not something you're into doesn't mean it's not a legitimate thing that others can safely enjoy.
There are two issues that I have with the video.
At 0.42 seconds into the music video, a newspaper headline type thing scrolls across the screen saying 'Daddy issues?'.
I think this gives the impression to viewers who don't know anything about BDSM that in order to be into 'chains and whips', you need to have some sort of sexual imbalance; that there must be something wrong with you. This is totally the wrong impression to be giving. Most people, kinky or not have some issues. However, having an interest in BDSM doesn't mean that you have a warped view of sex; in fact, I would argue that people who are into power play and sadomasochism are aften much more sure about their likes, dislikes and limits than vanilla folk. This is because it's so much more important when you're deal with kink; if you don't have limits and make them known, there is the risk of injury, so it's something you have to be very clear about in your head.
The other issue is the world 'slut' which is written down by one of the reporters, and is plastered on her dress. Just because you're into BDSM doesn't mean you sleep around or any of the other negative connotations that go along with the word slut. Liking being spanked or tied up or dominated (or conversely, liking spanking people, tying people up or dominating them) doesn't make you a sexual devient, and it doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with you.
The other issue is the world 'slut' which is written down by one of the reporters, and is plastered on her dress. Just because you're into BDSM doesn't mean you sleep around or any of the other negative connotations that go along with the word slut. Liking being spanked or tied up or dominated (or conversely, liking spanking people, tying people up or dominating them) doesn't make you a sexual devient, and it doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with you.
"Sexual deviancy", in my mind, involves non-consensual play - something that is frowned upon by the vast majority of the BDSM community. Of course, there is such a kink as 'consensual non-consent', which is a different story all together (think forced sex, rape play, punishments), but because it's consensual, it's no longer deviancy.
The second issue I have is at 2m 15s, you see Rihanna tied up on the floor, wearing a white polka dotted leotard and pastel shoes with her hair in pigtails.
My issue isn't with the fact that she's tied up (although the rigging is mediocre at best), it's more the fact that she looks and is dressed so young. I really, really hate the sexualisation of tweens - kids should be innocent. Rihanna's target audience young adults (16-25ish), but the reality is that 10-15 year olds are still listening and watching her music and videos. I think celebrities should be aware of the reality that while they sexualise themselves at whatever age they are, by dressing younger than they are (like in this case, Rihanna dressed and looking much more like a 14 year old than the 22 year old she is), they are sexualizing children.
I think it would have been totally different if she was wearing, say, a diaper, because any viewer would clearly be able to see at a glance that it's just play - she isn't a baby. However, a quick glance, if you didn't know who the singer was, could give you the impression that the girl tied up actually was a 14 year old, and that's where the sexualisation is.
A video that I can more readily see an issue with is the video for Destination Unknown.
A video that I can more readily see an issue with is the video for Destination Unknown.
This video is clear sexualisation of women. It is reducing women to a collection of body parts (ass, lips, legs, boobs). Personally, it doesn't bother me at all; ass and boobs are amazing, and we should celebrate them. However, I can see the other side of the argument that women are much more than just a body. I do think that there's a hell of a lot more to argue about this video than S&M by Rihanna.